Capuchin Search Particle Swarm Optimization (CS-PSO) based Optimized Approach to Improve the QoS Provisioning in Cloud Computing Environment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This review introduces the methods for further enhancing resource assignment in distributed computing situations taking into account QoS restrictions. While resource distribution typically affects the quality of service (QoS) of cloud organizations, QoS constraints such as response time, throughput, hold-up time, and makespan are key factors to take into account. The approach makes use of a methodology from the Capuchin Search Particle Large Number Improvement (CS-PSO) apparatus to smooth out resource designation while taking QoS constraints into account. Throughput, reaction time, makespan, holding time, and resource use are just a few of the objectives the approach works on. The method divides the resources in an optimum way using the K-medoids batching scheme. During batching, projects are divided into two-pack assembles, and the resource segment method is enhanced to obtain the optimal configuration. The exploratory association makes use of the JAVA device and the GWA-T-12 Bitbrains dataset for replication. The outrageous worth advancement problem of the multivariable capacity is addressed using the superior calculation. The simulation findings demonstrate that the core (Cloud Molecule Multitude Improvement, CPSO) computation during 500 ages has not reached assembly repeatedly, repeatedly, repeatedly, and repeatedly, respectively.The connection analysis reveals that the developed model outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches. Generally speaking, this approach provides significant areas of strength for a successful procedure for improving resource designation in distributed processing conditions and can be applied to address a variety of resource segment challenges, such as virtual machine setup, work arranging, and resource allocation. Because of this, the capuchin search molecule enhancement algorithm (CSPSO) ensures the success of the improvement measures, such as minimal streamlined polynomial math, rapid consolidation speed, high productivity, and a wide variety of people.
Article Details
References
Rashid, Aaqib, and Amit Chaturvedi. "Cloud computing characteristics and services: a brief review." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 7, no. 2 (2019): 421-426.
Kollolu, Roopha. "Infrastructural Constraints of Cloud Computing." International Journal of Management, Technology and Engineering 10 (2020): 255-260.
Alam, Tanweer. "Cloud Computing and its role in the Information Technology." IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI) 1 (2021): 108-115.
Akintoye, Samson Busuyi, and Antoine Bagula. "Improving quality-of-service in cloud/fog computing through efficient resource allocation." Sensors 19, no. 6 (2019): 1267.
Kumar, Mohit, SubhashChander Sharma, AnubhavGoel, and Santar Pal Singh. "A comprehensive survey for scheduling techniques in cloud computing." Journal of Network and Computer Applications 143 (2019): 1-33.
Devarasetty, Prasad, and Satyananda Reddy. "Genetic algorithm for quality of service based resource allocation in cloud computing." Evolutionary Intelligence 14, no. 2 (2021): 381-387.
Shrimali, B., & Patel, H. (2020). Multi-objective optimization oriented policy for performance and energy efficient resource allocation in Cloud environment. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 32(7), 860-869.
Wei, G., Vasilakos, A.V., Zheng, Y. et al. A game-theoretic method of fair resource allocation for cloud computing services. J Supercomput 54, 252–269 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-009-0318-1
Zhao, Junhui, Qiuping Li, Yi Gong, and Ke Zhang. "Computation offloading and resource allocation for cloud assisted mobile edge computing in vehicular networks." IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 68, no. 8 (2019): 7944-7956.
C. S. Pawar and R. B. Wagh, "Priority Based Dynamic Resource Allocation in Cloud Computing," 2012 International Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing, Mangalore, India, 2012, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ISCOS.2012.14.
Belgacem, Ali, KaddaBeghdad-Bey, HassinaNacer, and Sofiane Bouznad. "Efficient dynamic resource allocation method for cloud computing environment." Cluster Computing 23, no. 4 (2020): 2871-2889.
Muthulakshmi, B., and Krishnan Somasundaram. "A hybrid ABC-SA based optimized scheduling and resource allocation for cloud environment." Cluster Computing 22, no. 5 (2019): 10769-10777.
Ramasamy, Vadivel, and SudalaiMuthuThalavai Pillai. "An effective HPSO-MGA optimization algorithm for dynamic resource allocation in cloud environment." Cluster Computing 23, no. 3 (2020): 1711-1724.
Gao, Xiangqiang, Rongke Liu, and Aryan Kaushik. "Hierarchical multi-agent optimization for resource allocation in cloud computing." IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 32, no. 3 (2020): 692-707.
Samriya, J. K. ., & Kumar, N. (2022). Spider Monkey Optimization based Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation in Cloud Environment. Trends in Sciences, 19(1), 1710. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.1710
A. Thakur and M. S. Goraya, “RAFL: A hybrid metaheuristic based resource allocation framework for load balancing in cloud computing environment,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 116, p. 102485, 2022.
Raed Abdulkareem HASAN*, Muamer N. MOHAMMED, A Krill Herd Behaviour Inspired Load Balancing of Tasks in Cloud Computing, Studies in Informatics and Control, ISSN 1220-1766, vol. 26(4), pp. 413-424, 2017.
Ramasamy, V., Thalavai Pillai, S. An effective HPSO-MGA optimization algorithm for dynamic resource allocation in cloud environment. Cluster Comput 23, 1711–1724 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03118-x.
K. K. Gola, B. M. Singh, B. Gupta, N. Chaurasia, and S. Arya, “multi?objective hybrid capuchin search with genetic algorithm based hierarchical resource allocation scheme with Clustering Model in cloud computing environment,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 35, no. 7, 2023.
Doumari S. A., Givi H., Dehghani M., Montazeri Z., Leiva V. A new two-stage algorithm for solving optimization problems. Entropy . 2021;23(4):491–496. doi: 10.3390/e23040491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hai T., Chen W. C., Wang X. N., Chen L. Multi-objective reservoir operation using particle swarm optimization with adaptive random inertia weights. Water Science and Engineering . 2020;13(2):136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2020.06.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wang X. L., Xie W. X., Li L. Q. Interacting t-s fuzzy particle filter algorithm for transfer probability matrix of adaptive online estimation model. Digital Signal Processing . 2021;110(5):102944–102949. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gao X., Xie W., Chen S., Yang J., Chen B. The prediction of human abdominal adiposity based on the combination of a particle swarm algorithm and support vector machine. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2020;17(3):1117–1123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lenin K. Tailored particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving optimal reactive power problem. International Journal of Regulation and Governance . 2020;5(12):246–255. doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i12.2017.500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Han L., Tang L., Tang Y. Sports image detection based on particle swarm optimization algorithm. Microprocessors and Microsystems . 2020;80(2):103345–103348. [Google Scholar]
Du S., Deng Q. Unscented particle filter algorithm based on divide-and-conquer sampling for target tracking. Sensors . 2021;21(6):2236–2240. doi: 10.3390/s21062236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sun S., Zhang H., Dong L., Fang X., Khan M. S. Multibyte electromagnetic analysis based on particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied Sciences . 2021;11(2):839–843. doi: 10.3390/app11020839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Song Y. A fractional pid controller based on particle swarm optimization algorithm. Journal of Autonomous Intelligence . 2020;3(1):1–7. doi: 10.32629/jai.v3i1.94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Zeng W., Zhu W., Hui T., Chen L., Xie J. An imc-pid controller with particle swarm optimization algorithm for msbr core power control. Nuclear Engineering and Design . 2020;360(2):110513–110517. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kumari R., Gupta N., Kumar N. Cumulative histogram based dynamic particle swarm optimization algorithm for image segmentation. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering . 2020;11(5):557–567. doi: 10.21817/indjcse/2020/v11i5/201105183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dimf, G. P. ., Kumar , P. ., & Manju, V. N. . (2023). An Efficient Power Theft Detection Using Modified Deep Artificial Neural Network (MDANN). International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(1), 01–11. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/2437.
Omidinasab F., Goodarzimehr V. A hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for truss structures with discrete variables. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics . 2020;6(3):593–604. [Google Scholar]
Zhu M., Chu S. C., Yang Q., Li W., Pan J. S. Compact sine cosine algorithm with multigroup and multistrategy for dispatching system of public transit vehicles. Journal of Advanced Transportation . 2021;2021(2):16. doi: 10.1155/2021/5526127.5526127 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]