Denoising ECG Signal Using DWT with EAVO

Main Article Content

S. Balasubramanian
Mahaveer Singh Naruka
Gaurav Tewari


Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death across the world, and traditional methods for determining cardiac health are highly invasive and expensive. Detecting CVDs early is critical for effective treatment, yet traditional detection methods lack accessibility, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness – leaving patients with little hope of taking control of their own cardiac health. Noisy ECG signals make it difficult for health practitioners to accurately read and determine heart health. Unreliable readings can lead to misdiagnosis and needless expense. Despite the importance of ECG analysis, traditional methods of signal denoising are inefficient and can produce inaccurate results. This means that medical practitioners are struggling to obtain reliable readings, leaving them unable to accurately treat their patients and leading to a lack of confidence in the medical field. The Enhanced African Vulture Optimization (AVO) algorithm with Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) optimized by adaptive switching mean filtration (SMF) is proven to provide accurate denoising of the ECG signal. With this reliable method, medical professionals can quickly and accurately diagnose patients. Obtaining accurate ECG signals and interpreting them quickly is a challenge for healthcare professionals. Not only it takes a lot of time and skill but also requires specialized software to interpret the signals accurately. Healthcare professionals are facing a serious challenge when it comes to obtaining accurate ECG signals and interpreting them quickly. It requires them to spend extra time and effort, as well as specialize in the field with expensive software. Time is of the essence in healthcare and ECG readings can mean the difference between life and death. Specialized software can be expensive and time-consuming for those who don't have the resources or expertise. Our easy-to-use platform allows healthcare professionals to quickly interpret ECG signals, saving time, money, and lives! Get accurate readings. The EAVO algorithm and MIT-BIH dataset provide an effective solution to this problem. With the proposed filter built using EAVO, businesses can attain significant enhancements in reliable parameters and obtain accurate testing results in terms of SNR, MD, MSE and NRMSE.

Article Details

How to Cite
Balasubramanian, S. ., M. S. . Naruka, and G. Tewari. “Denoising ECG Signal Using DWT With EAVO”. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, vol. 11, no. 3s, Mar. 2023, pp. 231-7,


K. Antczak, “A generative adversarial approach to ecg synthesis and denoising”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.02700, Sep 2020.

G. Georgieva-Tsaneva, and K. Tcheshmedjiev, “Denoising of electrocardiogram data with methods of wavelet transform”. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 9-16, June 2013.

Z. A. A. Alyasseri, A. T. Khader, M. A. Al-Betar, and M. A. Awadallah, “Hybridizing ?-hill climbing with wavelet transform for denoising ECG signals”. Information Sciences, Vol.429, pp.229-246, March 2018.

I. Houamed, L. Saidi, and F. Srairi, “ECG signal denoising by fractional wavelet transform thresholding”. Research on Biomedical Engineering, Vol.36(3), pp.349-360, July 2020.

J. A. Van Alste, and T. S. Schilder, “Removal of base-line wander and power-line interference from the ECG by an efficient FIR filter with a reduced number of taps”. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, Vol. BME-32(12), pp. 1052-1060, December 1985.

R. Liu, M. Shu, and C. Chen, “ECG signal denoising and reconstruction based on basis pursuit”. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1591, February 2021.

W. Mohguen, and S. Bouguezel, “Denoising the ECG Signal Using Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition”. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, Vol. 11(5), pp. 7536-7541, October 2021.

A. K. Verma, I. Saini, and B. S. Saini, “Alexander fractional differential window filter for ECG denoising”. Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, Vol. 41(2), pp. 519-539, April 2018.

A. Kumar, R. Komaragiri, and M. Kumar, “A Wavelet Transform-Based Filter Bank Architecture for ECG Signal

Denoising”, In Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques, Vol.708, pp. 249-255, Springer, Singapore, November 2018.

H. Hao, M. Liu, P. Xiong, H. Du, H. Zhang, F. Lin, and X. Liu, “Multi-lead model-based ECG signal denoising by guided filter”. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 79, pp, 34-44, March 2019.

G. Georgieva-Tsaneva, “Wavelet based interval varying algorithm for optimal non-stationary signal denoising”, In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on

Computer Systems and Technologies, pp. 200-206, June 2019.

W. Jenkal, R. Latif, A. Toumanari,A. Elouardi, A. Hatim, and O. El’bcharri “Real-time hardware architecture of the adaptive dual threshold filter based ECG signal denoising”. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 96(14), July 2018.

Z. Wang, J. Zhu, T. Yan, and L. Yang, “A new modified wavelet-based ECG denoising”. Computer Assisted

Surgery, Vol. 24(sup1), pp. 174-183, January 2019.

H. D. Hesar, and M. Mohebbi, “An adaptive Kalman filter bank for ECG denoising”. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, Vol. 25(1), pp. 13-21, March 2020.

B. R. Manju, and M. R. Sneha, “ECG denoising using wiener filter and kalman filter”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 171, pp. 273-281, April 2020.

S. Mejhoudi, R. Latif, A. Saddik, W. Jenkal, and A. El Ouardi, “Speeding up an Adaptive Filter based ECG Signal Pre-processing on Embedded Architectures”. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 12(5), 2021.

S. Yadav, S. K. Saha, R. Kar, and D. Mandal, “Optimized adaptive noise canceller for denoising cardiovascular signal using SOS algorithm”. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Vol. 69, 102830, August 2021.

C. Pravin, and V. Ojha, “A novel ecg signal denoising filter selection algorithm based on conventional neural networks”. In 2020 19th IEEE International Conference on Machine

Learning and Applications (ICMLA), IEEE, December

, pp. 1094-1100,

DOI: 10.1109/ICMLA51294.2020.00176

S. Saxena, R. Jais, and M. K. Hota, “Removal of powerline interference from ECG signal using FIR, IIR, DWT and NLMS adaptive filter”. In 2019 International conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP), IEEE, April 2019, pp. 0012-0016, DOI: 10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698112 [20] Z. A. A. Alyasseri, A. T. Khader, M. A. Al-Betar, A. K. Abasi, and S. N. Makhadmeh, “EEG signals denoising using optimal wavelet transform hybridized with efficient metaheuristic methods”. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp.1058410605, December 2019.

M. Rakshit, and S. Das, “An efficient ECG denoising methodology using empirical mode decomposition and adaptive switching mean filter”. Biomedical signal processing and control, Vol. 40, pp. 140-148, February 2018.

B. Abdollahzadeh, F. S. Gharehchopogh, and S. Mirjalili, “African vultures optimization algorithm: A new natureinspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 158, pp. 107408, August 2021.

S. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “The whale optimization algorithm”. Advances in engineering software, Vol. 95, pp. 51-67, May 2016.

R. Kahankova, R. Martinek, and P. Bilik, “Fetal ECG extraction from abdominal ECG using RLS based adaptive algorithms”. In 2017 18th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), IEEE, May 2017, pp. 337-342, DOI: 10.1109/CarpathianCC.2017.7970422

E. Fotiadou, and R. Vullings, “Multi-channel fetal ECG denoising with deep convolutional neural networks”. Frontiers in Pediatrics, Vol.8, pp. 508, August 2020.

M. Sulaiman, S. Ahmad, J. Iqbal, A. Khan, and R. Khan, “Optimal operation of the hybrid electricity generation

system using multiverse optimization algorithm”. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, Vol.2019, March 2019,

W. Hao, Y. Chen, and Y. Xin, “ECG baseline wander correction by mean-median filter and discrete wavelet transform”. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE, pp. 2712-2715, August 2011,

DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090744