Evaluation of Quality of a Project Management & Scientific Publications Based On a New Wisdom Framework

Abstract

This is a theoretical research paper. It presents a proposal for the evaluation of the quality of a project management based on a new and ‘General Cognitive Model of Wisdom’ -GCMW-. For the development of this GCMW, is proposed the conception of an ‘Information Ecosystem’ -IE-, which is composed by the following ‘cognitive units’: Data -D-; Information -I-; Knowledge(tacit, explicit) - K(tacit, explicit) = (Kt,e)- and Wisdom(tacit, explicit) -W(tacit, explicit) = (Wt,e)-, compactly written as DIKt,eWt,e. By aligning this IE with the DIKW hierarchical conception, wehave created a new, no hierarchical, integrated and generalized framework -the GCMW-. This GCMW framework aims -as an insight generator or strategic foresight- to provide a better assessment to different problems in any field of science, from information science, applied researchers or a more general audience as per example, to point out the theoretical and conceptual bases for the interaction between the project manager and this GCMW framework.It is introduced a new set of logical –general-, definitions for the DIKW to instrumentalize the GCMW framework. Finally, based on the GCMW framework, we have proposed a ‘Particular Cognitive Model of Wisdom’ -PCMW- for paper quality evaluation. Aiming at to build a comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of the quality of any scientific production, is derived from the GCMW framework a new no-hierarchical model -the PCMW framework- and a new set of logical –particular-, definitions for the DIKW are introduced to instrumentalize the PCMW towards paper quality assessment. This particular framework should provide –for any paper being written-, a better assessment and insight generator. By last, as we are admitting that any paper published has quality so; the proposal is, the quality of this paper is complete if -and only if-, the paper has also W. Both, the PCMW and the particular DIKW instruments definitions, are necessary and sufficient conditions for guaranteeing -guiding- if the paper -which is in evaluation-, has W.