Assessing Pronated Foot Correction: A Comparative Analysis of Structured Exercise Programs and Conventional Barefoot Orthotic Support

Abstract

Introduction: The ankle joint, which connects the lower leg and foot and permits dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, is an important synovial hinge joint. The 26-foot bones that make up the ankle joint complex include 33 joints: talocalcaneal, tibiotalar, and transverse tarsal. Significant forces can be applied on the foot's ability to adapt to various surfaces during walking and running. This study looks at the effects of a structured exercise programme and a modified barefoot orthotic support on lower limb injuries, foot deformities, and biomechanics in individuals with pronated foot issues. The relationship between low back pain, knee adduction moments, pelvic motion, and foot mechanics is investigated in this study. Plantar pressure distribution and the effectiveness of bespoke foot orthoses for pronated feet symptoms are impacted by extrinsic rearfoot posts. To enhance pronation-related therapies, the study looks into foot type responses and dose-response effects.

Material and Methods: The study conducted at Krishna College of Physiotherapy in KIMSDU, Karad, "The Effectiveness of Structured Exercise Programme and Modified Barefoot Orthotic Support on Pronated Foot in Collegiates," uses a strict experimental design. A prevalence study of flexible flat foot was used to estimate the sample size of 100. SPSS-25 is used for statistical analysis, including paired and unpaired t-tests, in this study. Strict inclusion criteria centre on marked pronation, and measuring tools and materials are carefully selected for biomechanical evaluation. A thorough assessment is provided by outcome measures such as the Rearfoot Angle, Foot Posture Index, and Navicular Drop Test. A comprehensive investigation of long-term consequences can be conducted within the one-year timeframe, and the academic context lends legitimacy. The methodology makes a substantial contribution to the field of musculoskeletal health research by guaranteeing accuracy, validity, and relevance when examining therapies for pronated foot.

Result: The Structured Exercise Programme and Modified Barefoot Orthotic Support were implemented, and the results showed a considerable improvement in navicular drop, foot posture index, and rarefoot angle scores. These results provide strong proof of the usefulness of these therapies in reducing the negative consequences of pronated feet. The study supports the alternate theory while also validating the main hypothesis and offering insightful information to researchers and healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: In summary, this study advances our knowledge of successful treatments for disorders involving the pronated foot by highlighting the advantages of a structured exercise regimen and modified barefoot orthotic support. Improved management of pronated foot issues in a variety of populations is made possible by the thorough statistical analyses and thorough interpretation of the results, which highlight the effectiveness and dependability of these therapies.