Analysis of the Performance of IoT Networks in Acoustic Environment by using LZW Data Compression Technique
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) has experienced phenomenal growth, opening up a wide range of applications in many settings. Due to the properties of sound propagation, IoT networks operating in acoustic environments in particular present special difficulties. Data compression techniques can be used to minimize overhead and maximize resource utilization in these networks to increase performance. The performance of IoT networks in acoustic environments is examined in this study, with a focus on routing overhead, throughput, and typical end-to-end delay. Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) data compression is used to reduce data size and boost communication effectiveness. Three well-known protocols—MQTT, CoAP, and Machine-to-Machine (M2M)—are assessed in relation to acoustic Internet of Things networks. To mimic different acoustic conditions and collect performance metrics, a thorough experimental setup is used. Different network topologies, data speeds, and compression settings are used in the studies to determine how they affect the performance metrics. According to the analysis's findings, all three protocols' routing overhead is greatly decreased by the LZW data compression approach, which enhances network scalability and lowers energy usage. Additionally, the compressed data size has a positive impact on network throughput, allowing for effective data transmission in acoustic contexts with limited resources. Additionally, using LZW compression is seen to minimize the average end-to-end delay, improving real-time communication applications. This study advances knowledge of IoT networks operating in acoustic environments and the effects of data reduction methods on their functionality. The results offer useful information for network engineers and system designers to optimize the performance of IoT networks in similar situations. Additionally, a comparison of the MQTT, CoAP, and M2M protocols' suitability for acoustic IoT deployments is provided, assisting in the choice of protocol for particular application needs.
Article Details
References
Darabkh, K. A., Amro, O. M., Al-Zubi, R. T., & Salameh, H. B. (2021). Yet efficient routing protocols for half-and full-duplex cognitive radio Ad-Hoc Networks over IoT environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 173, 102836.
Azar, J., Makhoul, A., Couturier, R., & Demerjian, J. (2020). Robust IoT time series classification with data compression and deep learning. Neurocomputing, 398, 222-234.
Han, M., Duan, J., Khairy, S., & Cai, L. X. (2020). Enabling sustainable underwater IoT networks with energy harvesting: a decentralized reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(10), 9953-9964.
Robinson, Y. H., Krishnan, R. S., Julie, E. G., Kumar, R., & Thong, P. H. (2019). Neighbor knowledge-based rebroadcast algorithm for minimizing the routing overhead in mobile ad-hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 93, 101896.
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., & Göker, M. (2019). TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nature communications, 10(1), 2182.
Venkataramanan, A. R. ., Kanimozhi, K. V. ., Valarmathia, K. ., Therasa, M. ., Hemalatha, S. ., Thangamani, M. ., & Gulati, K. . (2023). A Survey on Covid-19 & Its Impacts. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(3s), 129 –. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/2550
Gorbunova, A. V., Vishnevsky, V. M., & Larionov, A. A. (2020). Evaluation of the end-to-end delay of a multiphase queuing system using artificial neural networks. In Distributed Computer and Communication Networks: 23rd International Conference, DCCN 2020, Moscow, Russia, September 14–18, 2020, Revised Selected Papers 23 (pp. 631-642). Springer International Publishing.
Dinculean?, D., & Cheng, X. (2019). Vulnerabilities and limitations of MQTT protocol used between IoT devices. Applied Sciences, 9(5), 848.
Bansal, M., & Priya. (2021). Performance comparison of MQTT and CoAP protocols in different simulation environments. Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies: Proceedings of ICICCT 2020, 549-560.
Railkar, P. N., Mahalle, P. N., & Shinde, G. R. (2021). Scalable Trust Management model for Machine To Machine communication in Internet of Things using Fuzzy approach. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 2483-2495.
Qiu, T., Zhao, Z., Zhang, T., Chen, C., & Chen, C. P. (2019). Underwater Internet of Things in smart ocean: System architecture and open issues. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 16(7), 4297-4307.
Safieh, M., & Freudenberger, J. (2019). Efficient VLSI architecture for the parallel dictionary LZW data compression algorithm. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 13(5), 576-583.
Mohammadi, H., Ghaderzadeh, A., & Sheikh Ahmadi, A. (2022). A Novel Hybrid Medical Data Compression Using Huffman Coding and LZW in IoT. IETE Journal of Research, 1-15.
Ms. Mohini Dadhe, Ms. Sneha Miskin. (2015). Optimized Wireless Stethoscope Using Butterworth Filter. International Journal of New Practices in Management and Engineering, 4(03), 01 - 05. Retrieved from http://ijnpme.org/index.php/IJNPME/article/view/37
Khan, M. A., Khan, M. A., Jan, S. U., Ahmad, J., Jamal, S. S., Shah, A. A., ... & Buchanan, W. J. (2021). A deep learning-based intrusion detection system for mqtt enabled iot. Sensors, 21(21), 7016.
Ahammad, D. S. K. H. (2022). Microarray Cancer Classification with Stacked Classifier in Machine Learning Integrated Grid L1-Regulated Feature Selection. Machine Learning Applications in Engineering Education and Management, 2(1), 01–10. Retrieved from http://yashikajournals.com/index.php/mlaeem/article/view/18
Esposito, M., Kowalska, A., Hansen, A., Rodríguez, M., & Santos, M. Optimizing Resource Allocation in Engineering Management with Machine Learning. Kuwait Journal of Machine Learning, 1(2). Retrieved from http://kuwaitjournals.com/index.php/kjml/article/view/115
Tyagi, D., Agrawal, R., & Singh, H. M. (2018, October). A survey on MAC layer protocols for machine to machine communication. In 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN) (pp. 285-288). IEEE.
Larmo, A., Ratilainen, A., & Saarinen, J. (2018). Impact of CoAP and MQTT on NB-IoT system performance. Sensors, 19(1), 7.
Sisodia, A., & Kundu, S. (2019, November). Enrichment of performance of operation based routing protocols of WSN using data compression. In 2019 8th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) (pp. 193-199). IEEE.
Ahmed Ali, Anaïs Dupont,Deep Generative Models for Image Synthesis and Style Transfer , Machine Learning Applications Conference Proceedings, Vol 2 2022.
Sisodia, A., & Yadav, A. K. (2022). Confabulation of Different IoT Approaches with and without Data Compression. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 28(11), 963-981.
Sisodia, A., & Swati, H. H. (2020). Incorporation of non-fictional applications in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 9(11).
Sisodia, A., Vishnoi, S., & Yadav, A. K. (2023). To Brace Society 5.0: Enhanced Reliability with a Cost-Effective Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network. In Sustainable Computing: Transforming Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0 (pp. 171-185). Cham: Springer International Publishing.